Tags: authority, elder, elders, leadership
I can not in good conscience say that a deacon has any authority over anyone else in the body other than the natural leadership that is grown from following Jesus words “Mar 10:43 But whoever would be great among you must be your servant.” Being great or noticeable is derived from service alone.
These ideas are not set in stone, as I am still flushing them out. However, I would enjoy your feedback.
If 1 Tim 3 and Titus 1 list "qualifications", then we would have no elders, because no one would be qualified: no one is blameless. Instead, I think 1 Tim 3 and Titus 1 list characteristics. These should be characteristics of all followers of Jesus Christ.
I see elders functioning as "examples" for other believers. They are selected (recognized) by others for their service to others (Matt 20:25-27) and their Christ-like character (1 Tim 3, Titus 1). "Leaders" in the scriptural sense do not try to force, coerce, or even persuade others to follow or submit. Following and submitting is a function of the one following, not the one leading. When the church recognizes leaders (elders), then it helps us all know who to look to as examples and who to go to for advice.
By the way... after much searching, I have found no scriptural requirements for elders/pastors/bishops that are not also scriptural requirements for ALL believers.
-Alan
I agree with you Alan. I think the characteristics of elders are characteristics that all believers should be aspiring to. Also I wanted to comment on Michael's earlier post in that I do not think anyone in the Body of Christ is given authority over anyone else. Jesus is the only One that has authority *over* people.
I like to use the term "influence" with regard to leadership. The leaders in my spiritual life are people whom I have allowed to have influence on my thoughts and decisions because of the example of their lives and because of the wisdom they have shared with me. These are people that I have grown to trust and so I give weight to the things they say and do. They do not have authority over me, but I have granted them influence into my life.
I think the idea of the "office" of a bishop is really foreign to the NT. I think that is a mistranslation of the Greek there in 1 Tim. 3:1. J. N. Darby translates this passage as, "if anyone aspires to oversight...". I think that to oversee (episkopos) was and is a function in the Body of Christ and not an office.
Bill
Alan Knox said:If 1 Tim 3 and Titus 1 list "qualifications", then we would have no elders, because no one would be qualified: no one is blameless. Instead, I think 1 Tim 3 and Titus 1 list characteristics. These should be characteristics of all followers of Jesus Christ.
I see elders functioning as "examples" for other believers. They are selected (recognized) by others for their service to others (Matt 20:25-27) and their Christ-like character (1 Tim 3, Titus 1). "Leaders" in the scriptural sense do not try to force, coerce, or even persuade others to follow or submit. Following and submitting is a function of the one following, not the one leading. When the church recognizes leaders (elders), then it helps us all know who to look to as examples and who to go to for advice.
By the way... after much searching, I have found no scriptural requirements for elders/pastors/bishops that are not also scriptural requirements for ALL believers.
-Alan
© 2012 Created by Dale Interactive.