Tags: authority, elder, elders, leadership
Hi Alan.
Which translations would you recommend for those verses you referenced, if not the NIV? I'd be interested to know which ones you rely on. I'm always interested in better scholarship.
Jesus did make clear that leadership in his kingdom was NOT to be done as the gentile rulers (e.g. Rome), by force and imposition. Rather, leadership was to be done like Jesus through serving, laying down one's life for others.
Also, what about the other verses?
It is interesting to me that in 1 Timothy 3:1 “The saying is trustworthy: If anyone aspires to the office of overseer, he desires a noble task,” uses the word “office” (episkopē) distinct from the normal use of “elder,” (episkopos). There seems to be an implication that apart from being an Elder, there is also an existing structure, namely the office itself.
This word (episcope) is used several other times in the New testament as well: Luke 19:44, Acts 1:20, and 1 Pet 2:12 where it is rendered either visitation or Bishoprick. In either case the root definition carries with it the idea of authority, management, or judgment.
Likewise in 1 Tim 3:8 there is a distinction from the word Deacon (Diakonos) and the office of a Deacon (diakoneo) in 3:10. Again, this implies an office or structure that was already in place during the writing. To be fair, there are 32 other uses of this word in the New Testament where it is rendered either, “minister,” “ministered,” “serve,” “administration,” and “office of a Deacon.” The implications of those passages do not suggest authority per se, but ministry on an equal level. I can not in good conscience say that a deacon has any authority over anyone else in the body other than the natural leadership that is grown from following Jesus words “Mar 10:43 But whoever would be great among you must be your servant.” Being great or noticeable is derived from service alone.
These ideas are not set in stone, as I am still flushing them out. However, I would enjoy your feedback.
I am still interested in why episkope is used in the passage and what special meaning it carries. Anyone?
Alan:
I have. 1Ti3 & Tit1 - "having faithful children." That actually means to have saved, born-again, believing children. One cannot be an elder until he has believing children. One can be an obedient believer and his children are still not yet saved.
There is more.
-john
Alan Knox said:
If 1 Tim 3 and Titus 1 list "qualifications", then we would have no elders, because no one would be qualified: no one is blameless. Instead, I think 1 Tim 3 and Titus 1 list characteristics. These should be characteristics of all followers of Jesus Christ.
I see elders functioning as "examples" for other believers. They are selected (recognized) by others for their service to others (Matt 20:25-27) and their Christ-like character (1 Tim 3, Titus 1). "Leaders" in the scriptural sense do not try to force, coerce, or even persuade others to follow or submit. Following and submitting is a function of the one following, not the one leading. When the church recognizes leaders (elders), then it helps us all know who to look to as examples and who to go to for advice.
By the way... after much searching, I have found no scriptural requirements for elders/pastors/bishops that are not also scriptural requirements for ALL believers.
-Alan
Maybe the premise is in error. "Obey" doesn't mean that the "them that have th rule over you" are arogantly issuing orders. Jesus is "meek and lowly, riding on a colt" and yet He is King! To be "obeyed." No one who is truly an elder would ever issue orders. It's simply not the way of a humble, lowly, servant. However, such a spiritual person, a truly, fully qualified elder, should be watched to hear and see what God is saying through them. The law wasn't spoken with thunderings, the SPirt, like a dove, whispers into our ears.
-john
Katie Mather said:
I know that I am joining in an old discussion, but here are a couple of thoughts that I had while reading all of your comments.
Michael, Tim and I have a healthy relationship with our grown children. We nurture them as adults and they are very responsible people. They do come to us from time to time to discuss with us areas in which they could use our input from our years of experience. We give recommendations and strong suggestions. They are likely able to be persuaded by our guidence because of our relationship with them. They know we are not here to control them or usurp their own responsibility. I could never imagine giving them a "command or order." It would be degrading to their maturity and I would be treating them as little children.
I see this is how elders are to function. Granted, not all believers are mature and can be guided in this way. But treating people as if they need to be ordered and commanded will produce more rebels than disciples.
The other thought that comes to mind is a discussion I had with Dr. Lynn Reddick (he is on the video on the Simplechurch.com home page). We were in a discussion about that scripture, Hebrews 13:17, really saying, "allow yourselves to be persuaded by those who guide you." When the Bible was translated by King James' boys, scripture was flavored to reflect King James' heirarchal system. Even after the reformation, translations were in support of the church's clergy/laity heirarchy.
Wouldn't it be wonderful to have a translation that more closely reflects the organic nature of the early church, rather than supporting the heirarchy of earthly kings and priests?!
© 2012 Created by Dale Interactive.